Cambridge Professor Arif Ahmed undercuts all potential arguments for the resurrection with his opening salvo (a variation of Hume's argument against the probability of miracles/magic). Habermas never really recovers, and his typical apologetics for the resurrection do not offer a coherent reply.
September 21, 2012
THIS is how you debate the resurrection. (Arif Ahmed vs. Gary Habermas Debate)
Cambridge Professor Arif Ahmed undercuts all potential arguments for the resurrection with his opening salvo (a variation of Hume's argument against the probability of miracles/magic). Habermas never really recovers, and his typical apologetics for the resurrection do not offer a coherent reply.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment