Right Wing radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh likes to refer to himself a “talent on loan from God”. He will be today’s exhibit of how beliefs have consequences, and how religious beliefs can cause harm .
On the subject of human-caused global warming, Rush (who has millions of listeners) has said:
"If you believe in God, then intellectually you cannot believe in man-made global warming. You must be agnostic or atheistic to believe that man controls something he can't create. It’s always been one of the reasons for my anti man-made global warming stance."
The purpose of this blog post is not to generate arguments over global warming. I merely offer the Limbaugh quote as an example of how a religious belief can drive irresponsible and dangerous attitudes which could have far-reaching implications for the planet.
With this faith-based claim, he sweeps aside any present or future scientific findings. His presuppositional beliefs in God and creationism dictate that he reject any scientific evidence to the contrary. He thinks that his god created the planet and therefore, nothing we can do as human beings could significantly damage it.
In his book The Way Things Ought To Be, he says:
"My views on the environment are rooted in my belief in Creation. I don't believe that life on earth began spontaneously or as a result of some haphazard, random selection process.”
But hey, it's just a belief, what's the harm - right?
If Rush’s ‘talent’ is on loan from God, then his god must be quite poor in the reasoning skills department. Does Rush not think that nuclear bombs could have an impact on our planet? That we can endlessly pollute and not endanger the conditions of the world in which our descendants will live?
Rush’s god is imaginary, but the influence this god wields over his mind, and the minds of his many followers poses a very real danger.
The gospels were in fact, divinely inspired. What is not generally known however is that God had consumed several barrels of communion wine and was feeling puckish. Being fairly well pickled, he...
Now, now everyone we all know our beloved Liberal/Progressive Christians are the ones can tell you with certainly what is or isn't true in The Holy Bible. What's a metaphor, what's a...
Indeed, the seminal paper and the book* for the Clergy Project each present multiple case studies of clergy-folk who realized their faith was bunk, but stayed on in their jobs to fake it, since the...
We cannot rule out, for example, that Gospel Jesus "predicts" his own death and resurrection by having those elements written into the story later by someone else. For example, suppose...
From 2:16 in the video: "I'm sorry it seems harsh, and I used to be much more generous about it but right now I would take homeopaths and I'd put them in a big sack with psychics,...
And on second thought, I'm going to question Carl Sagan's characterization of science as "far from" a perfect instrument of knowledge. Perhaps there's a bit of equivocating...
Yes, Turek is skipping a few (dozen, hundred, thousands) of intermediate steps between "whatever the guy says" and what eventually trickles down to Turek. Would Turek even be able to...
That's the problem with inerrancy, it's ridiculous on the face of it. So the fudging commences and caveats put in place. But that adds to the problem. Either it's all in inerrancy,...
What Licona says above is kinda like a retreat from key Protestant doctrines such as sōlā scrīptūrā, the Perspicuity of Scripture, and the Sufficiency of...
‘Devout readers who come across the texts described by Barker and Wells—and who are not alarmed or offended—must have their critical thinking skills turned off.’
Good stuff, David. Really, I think serious conservative Christians don't have any game except to fall back on genre. Mark invented a new genre, the Gospel, and the rules of that genre are the...
a) Jesus never expressed or implied his followers' salvation or sanctification depended on them affirming that inerrancy is limited to the original manuscripts
Excellent article at the link. Russell went a wee bit too heavy with his, "the atheist, that we can know there is not." Most atheists I'm aware of, would not make said assertion....