The Criminality of Earliest Christianity
Until the spread of Christianity, the Roman government held a remarkably tolerant and inclusive range of policies regarding ancient religious practice and assembly. Indeed, these pluralistic attitudes survived from the late Republic only to broaden and further solidify in the early Empire under Julius Caesar and Augustus in the first century B.C.E. Such strategies helped to maintain governance over Rome’s far-flung, expanding empire, particularly in the Greek East. The oriental cults of Cybele, Isis, and Osirus, for instance, enjoyed considerable state-sanction and embrace, despite mos maiorum and foreign competition with the politically established Roman pantheon. Albeit, considerable senatorial restrictions followed the youthful rise of Bacchanal nighttime assemblies, particularly with the licentiousness and various crimes associated with such gatherings.
The Savage Superstition
Even ongoing aggravation from the Jews, particularly in Jerusalem, but also in the urban centers, indeed even in Rome itself, did not prove sufficient provocation for the Roman government to outlaw the religion. Exemptions and concessions were made along the way, allowing the Jews to practice their codes, sabbath, and exclusive monotheistic devotion. The most famous of senators, Cicero, however, encapsulates the general assessment by learned Romans, describing early Judaism as a barbara superstitio (Flacc. 67). The Oxford Latin Dictionary confirms the connotative and denotative sense of the term superstitio as that which is characterized by “an attitude of irrational credulity,” a pejorative term precisely equivalent to the modern English “superstition.”
Christians as the Romans First Saw Them
As Roman provincial governor of Bythinia-Pontus (Asia Minor) in the early second century, Pliny the Younger routinely corresponded with the emperor Trajan. In one letter to the princeps (Epist. 10.96; c. 111 C.E.), Pliny described trouble arising from the spread of Christianity in his province, resulting in many punished and some even executed for their crime. And just what had been their crime? “None other than misguided and excessive superstition.” (Nihil aliud inveni quam superstitionem pravam et immodicam.) Even for broad-minded Roman sensibilities, the whimsical layer-cake of irrational early Christian myth-production was too extensive and over the top. The Christian West has traditionally foisted stereotypes of the Roman government, particularly the emperors, but also the ruling aristocracy, as a maniacally perverse lot and early Christian incarceration and execution as arising out of a deep streak of nigh-demonic madness. They, the rulers, were the irrational ones; how else could they have incarcerated, tortured, and executed the original leaders and devotees of the way?
0 comments:
Post a Comment