 |
| Get this huge book!! |
I had mentioned this
debate yesterday. Here is my planned opening statement:
My focus is on heinous, hideous, horrific levels of horrendous suffering
given the belief in a theistic God who is all-powerful, all-knowing, and perfect
good. Unless we focus on that kind of suffering, the kind that seems needless
and absolutely inexplicable, we’ll fail to see this problem for what it is.
Instead of focusing on bruises, sprained ankles, slaps on the cheek, a clump of
hair being pulled out, or sicknesses like colds and the flu, let’s focus
instead on people who have been burned alive, boiled alive, and buried alive.
God
may well have good reasons to allow for a modest amount of pain since we have
physical bodies and we will all die. So we can set aside that kind of suffering
as largely uninteresting in this discussion. Horrendous suffering, by contrast,
should be our focus. My perspective is a “minimal facts” approach to the
problem of suffering. I’m arguing that God should not allow a specific kind of
suffering, horrendous suffering. Failing to focus on it is a failure to
honestly search for the truth, for when horrendous suffering is our focus, the
standard theodicies don’t work.
My
contention is that the theistic God probably doesn't exist given the existence
of horrendous suffering. Just ask what we would expect to find if we woke up
one morning for the very first time. Would we expect to find so much horrendous
suffering on this planet? I submit that people would never guess there would be
as much horrendous suffering as there is in our world if such a God existed. For
it’s clear that God should never allow it. We wouldn’t expect the existence of
God since he could prevent it, should prevent it, yet doesn’t prevent it.