Im alittle surprised none of these has attracted any conversation. I think some of them are quite fair (numbers 1 and 2 particularly) while others are quite weak and are not very strong at all. Am I the only one that see's number 4 as being completely invalid?
I don't see it as invalid at all. For many theist beliefs there must be a non-material self that exists separately from the material self. Carrier is showing there is no evidence for such a thing. Please explain why you think it's invalid.
3 comments:
Im alittle surprised none of these has attracted any conversation. I think some of them are quite fair (numbers 1 and 2 particularly) while others are quite weak and are not very strong at all. Am I the only one that see's number 4 as being completely invalid?
I don't see it as invalid at all. For many theist beliefs there must be a non-material self that exists separately from the material self. Carrier is showing there is no evidence for such a thing. Please explain why you think it's invalid.
This dude is funny.
What caused the Bang?
I agree with King Nebuchadnezzar who said
the Most High is sovereign over the kingdoms of men and gives them to anyone he wishes.
Post a Comment