Debunking Creationism Sister Blog Started!
If you'll look on the navigation sidebar you'll see several sister Blogs have just been created by us. A couple of posts have already been made to Debunking Creationism by Touchstone. We're looking for people who have an expertise in these areas who would like to contribute to these Blogs.
8 comments:
I would be interested in contributing. If you take a look at my blog, I think you'll find that I am a good candidate for doing this:
http://aigbusted.blogspot.com
Sincerely,
Ryan
I would be interested in helping with Debunking the Christian Political Right.
I am a community organizer in IL, have a MA in Philosophy, and was an award-winning college newspaper editor.
Aigbusted and Steve, click on my name and email me.
Hi John,
I would be interested in going against this blog? Your call though?
Personally I would not want me on your blog. Your call though.
Rev Phil.
reverend huh? you're a silly man.
I've looked your blog, you're not uniqie.
So Rev does this mean you are going to take up the creationist cause? Curious, where do you stand? YEC, OEC, ID, evolutionary creationist, evolutionist?
As a Christian, I think the Debunking Creationism website might be very interesting. You might even find some Christians like myself arguing against six-day creation and Biblical literalism. [Was that your intent, to pit Christian against Christian? :) ]
And, though for me politics is a huge jump from philosophy, the Debunking the Christian Right might be interesting too, if there weren't so many other sites out there doing the same thing.
What is troubling, though, with the creation of these three sites together, is that you run the risk of defining yourself, not freely on an case-by-case basis, but simply in relation to the stereotypical Bible literalist. I would think that the free thinker would perhaps be ready to acknowledge flaws in evolutionary theory or perhaps for some issues align him or herself with the Christian Right, so it's perplexing to see free thinkers mold themselves in such a sterotypical way. Obviously, we'll have to see how the blogs are played out, but at first thought their creation seems strangely and ironically recactionary.
I have a lot of formal training in math and physics, as well as much other science, so I think I'd be a good fit to contribute. Can I help out?
Jeff
Post a Comment