Dear Christian, Doubt Is Not Your Enemy (Part 1)

0 comments
For the Christian, doubt is a bad thing - a lack of faith, or even worse, outright unbelief.  Early on in the Bible, doubt is portrayed in a negative light.  The Eden story in Genesis tells of a serpent planting doubt in the mind of Eve - did God really say not to eat from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil? 

According to the Bible, faith is the “evidence of things unseen” (Hebrews 11:1).  Without faith it is impossible to please God (Hebrews 11:6).  The writer of the gospel of John has Jesus saying “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed” (John 20:29).  In other words, God approves of those who believe on the basis of stories they have been told, rather than requiring evidence, as “doubting Thomas” did.

Such credulous acceptance of unverified word-of-mouth claims played an essential role in the rise of Christianity.  Miraculous stories abounded in ancient superstitious cultures, providing fertile soil for supernatural beliefs to grow and thrive.  Apologists and theologians love to claim that the New Testament stories are based on eyewitness accounts, but let’s face it – it’s not like the early believers could use a phone, or Google, or Snopes to investigate claims.  Do we really think that they climbed on a donkey and rode for days to track down and interview sources, to verify the tales they were told?  The fact that the people of that time would most likely not be skeptics is the more reason that it is vital we should scrutinize the biblical claims.

The First Two Blurbs for "Christianity is Not Great"

0 comments
My anthology, Christianity Is Not Great: How Faith Fails, should be out in October.You wouldn't believe who wrote a blurb for it! Check out the first two blurbs by clicking on the link. Then pre-order it today!

Quote of the Day by Darrell Barker

0 comments
Dear thoughtful friends, stay clear of people who require the threat of death and punishment to overcome the moral weakness of their contradictory and deeply flawed ideas.

10 Tips for Winning a Debate

0 comments
Some good advice from Hemant Mehta.

Do Ossuaries Claimed for St. James and St. Peter Prove a Historical Jesus?

0 comments
The James Ossuary
So they asked him, “What sign then will you give that we may see it and believe you? What will you do?”  (John 6: 30) 
It was bound to happen. After I posted seventeen reasons why any evidence for a Historical Jesus should be rejected, a person who calls himself “MrEveryman” left several comments with evidence he claimed proves that at least two ossuaries (bone  boxes) carried the bones of St. James and St. Peter, thus vindicating the Gospels.

The Holy Trinity as Incoherent

0 comments
The Holy Trinity has had a problematic history, partly evidenced by point of fact that theologians still don't agree on how it works, and partly  seen from its ex post facto evolution, shoehorned into the scant evidence of the biblical texts. From Ignatius of Antioch onwards we see development of the idea in early church thinking, until it is codified at the Council of Nicaea in the 4th century CE. There will be more talk later on what was creedally set out.

“Bryan College losing nearly 25% of faculty after 'Adam and Eve' controversy”

0 comments
                                                            
                                                               
You can read the full story HERE

An Apple Doesn't Fall Too Far From the Tree: The Bible's Failed Prophecies and Those Who Believe Them

0 comments
(This book was given to me by a Christian twenty-two years ago with a stern warning that I needed to either repent or perish.  The 228 page book was first published in 1988 (revised in 1991) was written by a Johns Hopkins University nuclear engineer, Robert W. Faid mathematically proving that Mikhail Gorbachev was the Antichrist having the Mark of the Beast on his forehead.)

Secular Leaders Online Classes Now Available

0 comments
Dr. John Shook is heading this project, which you can be read about right here. Classes available for June include:

The Science and Philosophy of Free Will, with Richard Carrier.

Sexual and Gender Diversity, with Julia Hemphill and Greta Christina.

Sean Faircloth on Defending Secular Government: Strategies for Success.

God’s Not Dead? How an Unscripted Philosopher can Disprove God, with Dan Fincke.

The Founding Fathers and Religion, with Myron Jackson with Sean Faircloth.

Does Morality Need God? A Christian and an Atheist Debate, with John Shook and David Baggett. [This one should be good!]

Dr. Shook is also doing a series of excellent "Humanist Matters" videos which can be viewed here.

Soon I'll be teaching one of these classes and doing a "Humanist Matters" video, so stay tuned.

Five Factors That Cause Christians To Lose Their Faith

0 comments
[Written by John W. Loftus on 12/9/10] I just thought I’d put this out there since I’ve been thinking about these kinds of things for years. By no means are all of the following factors involved in every story of deconversion. But in almost every case at least one of them is true. So here goes:

Do You Think You've Seen a Miracle? Think Again!

0 comments
David J. Hand's new book, The Improbability Principle: Why Coincidences, Miracles, and Rare Events Happen Every Day looks excellent!
In The Improbability Principle, the renowned statistician David J. Hand argues that extraordinarily rare events are anything but. In fact, they’re commonplace. Not only that, we should all expect to experience a miracle roughly once every month. But Hand is no believer in superstitions, prophecies, or the paranormal. His definition of “miracle” is thoroughly rational. No mystical or supernatural explanation is necessary to understand why someone is lucky enough to win the lottery twice, or is destined to be hit by lightning three times and still survive. All we need, Hand argues, is a firm grounding in a powerful set of laws: the laws of inevitability, of truly large numbers, of selection, of the probability lever, and of near enough.

Supreme Court Rules Town Meetings Can Have Prayer: A Mere Symbolic Victory for Conservatives

0 comments
You can read the story right here if you haven't heard yet. I don't usually comment on political issues although I could do so. Today's Supreme Court ruling deserves commentary though, and I'm the one to provide it. First off, the ruling is inconsistent with the First Amendment as applied to the state and local level by the Fourteenth Amendment. After the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified the Bill of Rights as a whole, including the First Amendment, applied to the state and local level. We fought a war over this so we cannot revisit that issue. The ruling is also stupid and offensive to those of us without faith. However, Christians are hailing it as an important victory while atheists think it's quite a setback for us. It is neither. It is merely a symbolic victory that serves as a morale booster for the conservatives, something that means little to either side in the long run. There's no reason to praise Jesus nor is there any reason for despair. Let me explain.

Evangelicals Concede They Are Losing in the Marketplace of Ideas

0 comments
"In the next decades we will see a massive decrease in evangelical influence politically, economically, culturally, and financially" writes John S. Dickerson, in The Great Evangelical Recession (p. 26). "260,000 evangelical young people walk away from Christianity each year. Of that number 35% will find their way back, and 65% do not find their way back. Why are they leaving? They don't believe anymore." [Dickerson, pp. 98-102]. "This is not a blip. This is a trend. And the trend is one of decline," said Ed Stetzer [as quoted in Dickerson, p. 32]. Here are a few of the books that are sounding the alarm:



The solutions offered in these books range from becoming culturally relevant to the young generation, committing to serious discipleship, fervent prayer, massive evangelism, and prioritizing the wisdom of God over the wisdom of man. Not one of them thinks for a nanosecond that the Christian faith should be abandoned, that their faith cannot win in the marketplace of ideas. But that is the real problem. In the minds of other evangelicals like Peter Enns, John Walton, Kenton Sparks, Christian Smith, Bruce Waltke, Randal Rauser, Rob Bell and others, they suggest revising and extending their faith to accommodate to the new realities. But when they do this they are conceding their faith is relativistic with no foundation. This is very interesting to watch.

We are watching the demise of evangelicalism!
Don't think so? Here is a page from Dickerson's book:

Kel on Ten Things Christians Should Keep in Mind When Debating Atheists

0 comments
His list would be something along the following:

From Minister to Atheist - Joe Holman On The Infidel Guy Show

0 comments
This interview took place in 2004, before the Clergy Project. Joe does a great job in it as a former team member here with me at DC. Link. [Click on the "Download" link underneath Joe's picture even if your cursor looks like an hour-glass.] Joe authored a good book, Project Bible Truth: A Minister Turns Atheist and Tells All.

Should We Believe in the Resurrection of Jesus?," A Submission by Brad Compton

0 comments
We have only two main sources on the resurrection of Jesus: the writings of Paul, and the Gospels. Let’s look at each of them in turn.

Robert Price and Edwin Suominen Interviewed by The Thinking Atheist

0 comments
Robert M. Price and Edwin A. Suominen co-wrote the excellent book, Evolving Out of Eden, which I have recommended very highly.They were interviewed by The Thinking Atheist recently. Enjoy.

Thinking Critically vs Skeptically

0 comments
[Edit 1/2/2015: This is another post in my series, "Do You Want To Be A Christian Apologist?" This is number 17 in the series, which are tagged with the words "Christian Apologetics" below, seen in reverse chronological order. So, let's say you want to be a Christian apologist, someone who defends the Christian faith. Then what must you do? The 17th thing you must do is make a distinction between thinking critically and thinking skeptically and focus on the former to the exclusion of the latter. ]

There shouldn't be a difference between thinking critically vs skeptically, for to think critically is to think skeptically, and vice versa. So why do I write about this? The answer in a word: Faith. Believers can and do think critically, especially the best of the best, like Alvin Plantinga, Richard Swinburne and William Lane Craig. Other notable Christian scholars are Paul Copan, Randal Rauser, Victor Reppert, David Marshall, and Matt Flannagan who regularly engage in apologetics against atheists like me. But they are not truly critical thinkers since they do not think skeptically.

Teaching students to be critical thinkers is very important but teaching them to have a skeptical disposition is more important. Critical thinking should lead to this disposition. The problem is that faith is a critical thinking stopper. It builds up a wall that stops believers dead in their tracks. They dare not go beyond it to the proper conclusion when applying the standards of critical thinking. Now I taught critical thinking classes as a Christian believer. So I know exactly what they are doing. Norman Geisler, one of the leading Christian apologists who defends the indefensible, even co-wrote a book with Ronald M. Brooks titled, Come, Let Us Reason: An Introduction to Logical Thinking.I don't know enough about the leading defenders of other religious faiths, but I suspect in their universities they teach critical thinking classes from textbooks they have written too. And I expect we would all agree with what they teach and write, except for some of the examples they use to illustrate a particular logical rule.

So what's the problem? Faith. Faith stunts one's critical thinking skills. It prohibits a person of faith from applying the set of critical thinking skills we all agree about. You can see this by how they argue, which I am documenting here. What believers do is to defend their faith rather than look critically at it, no matter what the intellectual cost. Stephen Law is right: “Anything based on faith, no matter how ludicrous, can be made to be consistent with the available evidence, given a little patience and ingenuity.” (Believing Bullshit, p. 75). If Christian apologists could think logically, without the perceived need to defend their religious sect's faith, they would see they are not thinking consistently critically.

In the hopes I can help nudge them along this road I recommend reading Theodore Schick and Lewis Vaughn's college textbook, How to Think About Weird Things: Critical Thinking for a New Age.There are newer, more expensive editions of this book than the one I linked to. But look inside this one then choose which edition at which price you can afford. But get it. You will see what I mean when I say there is no distinction between critical thinking and thinking skeptically. They are one and the same. That's why I argue faith is an irrational leap over the probabilities. I say believers operate by double standards. They do not think critically, in the sense I just wrote about and which this book could help show them. When we say the party of agnosticism and atheism is one of reason and science we mean it. We invite believers to the adult table, where an adult conversation can be had.

What is a True Christian?

0 comments
Christian, here is your chance. Tell us what is a true Christian. Come on, surely you know. Take a stab at it. I am confused. What describes a Christian that doesn't describe an atheist or Buddhist? What are the essential doctrines and actions and motivations that make you a Christian who is going to heaven, that excludes all other pretenders? Go ahead. Make my day!

A New Series of Podcasts on Dr. Avalos' The End of Biblical Studies

0 comments

 Dr. André Gagné, an Associate Professor in the Department of Theological Studies at Concordia University (Montreal, Canada), and Brice Jones, a doctoral student, have begun a series of podcasts devoted to my book, The End of Biblical Studies (2007). They are excellent discussions insofar as they highlight the very points that I would have chosen if I produced a podcast on that book. In addition, their podcasts are a welcome sign that more academic biblical scholars are willing to engage in a constructive discussion of my frank critique of the religionist orientation field of biblical studies. For the two podcasts (#5 and #7) already available on the book, and for podcasts on other interesting topics in religious and biblical studies (including their own journeys away from fundamentalism), see their Inquisitive Minds Podcasts.

On Stigamtizing Left-Handed People: Another Case Where Science is Eliminating What Faith Produced

0 comments
A friend of mine on Facebook asked why there are left-handed guitars when there aren't any left-handed pianos. He tries to teach his left-handed students to use right-handed guitars. As a right-handed guitarist myself, I could not play a left-handed guitar. So I wrote in response:
Let's just ask the right-handers, which I am one, to use left-handed guitars then! I see no reason to think anyone should use right-handed guitars! Let's have a revolution. Let's start strumming with left-handed guitars and do away with the right-handed ones! Usually the majorities rule while minorities suck. Screw that caste system. In the past, left-handed people were demonized by Christian folks. True story. So to correct this injustice let's make right handers conform from now on. Let's do it from compassion and love.
To see what produced the stigma and even demonization of left-handed people and what is eliminating it read below. Again, as Dawkins said, "science works, bitches." Faith does not! Get. Point. The.

Slavery. Bible Style. By Dr. James East

0 comments
This is really good!
What I do find disappointing, tremendously disappointing, is that modern people would defend the abhorrent views on slavery we find in the Bible. After all the progress we’ve made. But they don’t just defend these views as the primitive ideas of people in an ancient society; they ascribe them to God. God! The creator of the universe! The unchanging, omni-benevolent designer of morality himself wanted the Hebrews to own other people as property? Wanted people to do hard labour and provide sexual services against their will, amid violent beatings that left them barely clinging on to life?

And it is Christians who ask me where I get my morality from?

Unqualified Praise for "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey"

0 comments
As Dawkins said, "Science works, bitches." If you haven't been watching "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey" you are missing a great series of science based shows. My favorites so far are about Halley's Comet (Episode 4) and the Clean Room (Episode 7), but they are all great! You can watch them online for a couple of months afterward. LINK.

Matilda Joslyn Gage, A Largely Forgotten Feminist Hero

0 comments
Matilda Gage was a suffragist, a Native American activist, an abolitionist, a freethinker, and a prolific author, who was "born with a hatred of oppression". She spent her childhood in a house which was used as a station of the Underground Railroad. She faced prison for her actions under the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 which criminalized assistance to escaped slaves. Even though she was beset by both financial and physical (cardiac) problems throughout her life, her work for women's rights was extensive, practical, and often brilliantly executed.

Gage became involved in the women's rights movement in 1852 when she decided to speak at the National Women's Rights Convention in Syracuse, New York. She served as president of the National Woman Suffrage Association from 1875 to 1876, and served as either Chair of the Executive Committee or Vice President for over twenty years. During the 1876 convention, she successfully argued against a group of police who claimed the association was holding an illegal assembly. They left without pressing charges.

Gage was considered to be more radical than either Susan B. Anthony or Elizabeth Cady Stanton (with whom she wrote History of Woman Suffrage). Along with Stanton, she was a vocal critic of the Christian Church, which put her at odds with conservative suffragists such as Frances Willard and the Woman's Christian Temperance Union. Rather than arguing that women deserved the vote because their feminine morality would then properly influence legislation (as the WCTU did), she argued that they deserved suffrage as a 'natural right'. LINK.

The Homosexuality Debate Between Christians is Heating Up

0 comments
Yep. On the one side you have the traditionalists and on the other side you have the liberals. There doesn't seem to be any middle ground. More and more the traditionalists are changing their minds. Either Christians maintain their conservative faith despite the evidence and thereby are discredited like the young earth creationists, or they accept the results of science and risk losing the authority of the Bible. The traditionalists are simply wrong. The liberals are gerrymanders to maintain their faith no matter what the intellectual cost. Here are some of the recent books on the topic by Christians. Robert Price has predicted this issue will be the undoing of evangelicalism. LINK. When the dust settles and the traditionalists have become liberals the next generation will develop amnesia, thinking the church has always maintained this new position to the point of claiming they were the instigators of a new humane view about homosexuality. When it comes to faith, round and round we go, where it stops nobody knows.

Manly Yahweh is not the Philosopher's God

0 comments
Here I have assimilated two posts into one, looking at the idea that Yahweh, and the claims made about him, do not make a lot of sense with regard to the philosopher's god which developed over the next several thousand years.

Many people believe ridiculous things. Most of the time, we eventually shuffle off such beliefs. But some remain. In the case of Christianity, this is the belief in Yahweh. I don't mean to be overly rhetorical, but the belief in Yahweh is patently ridiculous, much more so than the belief in God.

Jeff Lowder: "Two Thumbs Way Up" for My Book WIBA

0 comments
I give this book two thumbs way up. In addition to courageously sharing his personal story, Loftus applies his considerable training and expertise into developing a cumulative case against Christianity and for atheism. I cannot think of another book like it on the market. Loftus is clearly familiar with the work of evangelical apologists like Copan, Craig, Geisler, and Moreland, as his book is filled with references to their work and objections to their arguments. In fact, his book might best be described as a “counter-apologetics” textbook. Anyone who reads this blog (The Secular Outpost) but has not yet read Why I Became an Atheist should do so. LINK.

James East Responds to John Dickson's "Top 10 Tips For Atheists"

0 comments
Dr. John Dickson is co-director of the Centre for Public Christianity. He has a PhD in ancient history and is a Senior Research Fellow with the Department of Ancient History at Macquarie University, where he teaches in the MA in Early Christian and Jewish Studies program. Recently he offered his top 10 list of tips for atheists. In it he tells us what he thinks atheists are doing wrong in debates with Christians. Dr. James East of Skeptic Ink Network responded excellently to each of his tips.

Here's one example. Dickson's first tip is for atheists to deal with the Christian "sophisticated literary trail of reasons for the Faith." East responded in part by saying something I've wondered about as well:
I think Dickson and many other “public Christians” are guilty of exactly the same thing. They speak out against the Dawkinses and Krausses of the world, rather than tackling leading atheist philosophers such as Graham Oppy, Theodore Drange and Quentin Smith, to name just a few. Christians devote entire websites to attacking The God Delusion, yet seem to completely ignore books like Why I Became an Atheist,in which John Loftus absolutely does engage with Plantinga, Craig and company, very successfully I think. And then there are classics such as Oppy’s Arguing About Gods, Sobel’s Logic and Theism, and so many more. LINK.

Image of Jesus Found on Dog's Butt! Praise Him!

0 comments

Is God's Power Diminishing Into Insignificance?

0 comments

Questions From a Newly Deconverted Person

0 comments
I'm new to agnosticism. And I'm positive of my outlook. However, the emotional aspects of my former Christian faith are still present, i.e. the guilt and the shame. What's the best way to get beyond this. I can see the positivity in a life without religious barriers. I'm just struggling to get there.
My reply:

Realize no one is to blame for your religious indoctrination. Turn the negative into positive action. Use what you've learned and make it your goal to help others out of it.
Thank you so much! I've been depressed for the last two weeks.
My reply:

I know the feeling. In time it will pass. Realize not many people have been freed to live the happy life free of brainwashing like you have.

The Case Against the Resurrection

0 comments

The Jewish Pagan Matrix for Jesus as The Christ

0 comments





Christian apologists strongly deny Greco-Roman pagan religious influence on the Jewish development of Jesus Christ, so any Christian apologist should have no trouble explaining the following paragraph from The Cambridge History of Judaism: Volume 3 The Early Roman Period